Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an adorable little “ham sandwich”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a big but very loyal companion. Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a worm. Lillooet is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a gentle spirit.
A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canadian entertainment facility have been caught in a struggle between a defunct facility, public officials and animal rights activists.
But those working directly with the whales say the impassioned discussion over their destiny often ignores the individual traits of the whales who, after growing up in captivity, have been thoroughly researched by the caretakers who interact with them daily.
After the Canadian government disallowed the export of the belugas to China, the embattled facility near the famous falls where they are housed threatened to end their lives unless the federal government pays for the cost of their care. Canada’s fisheries minister has rejected that ultimatum, placing the thirty whales in an increasingly precarious circumstance.
Scientists say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and communal behavior indicate they are deeply intelligent mammals – something Kristy Burgess observed first-hand.
She spent three years as a whale caretaker, a job that required earning the trust of the aquatic animals.
“Building up those relationships over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of affection. At the beginning, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “In time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and fulfilling.”
The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so surprised by the subtleties and idiosyncrasies in their characters. She developed a special affection for two female belugas with contrasting personalities.
“One whale chose me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Both changed the way I understand bonding.”
Her connection with the whales evolved against a background of rising activist criticism to their captivity.
During her time at the park, seven belugas and the park’s single killer whale, Kiska, succumbed. In total, 19 belugas have died at the park since 2019, a toll which the park links to natural mortality, but which campaigners say indicates the poor conditions in which they were housed.
The park did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she observed directly consequences of the shutdown. “Structural materials is breaking off from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being maintained. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and move about with chunks in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”
The facility did not reply to a request for comment, but earlier stated: “The whales … get far superior health care and constant care than any human in the United Kingdom, or anywhere else.”
The former employee was dismissed from the park in the spring following the passing of a beluga, an unwell beluga the employees had to euthanize. She said the facility believed information of the death were disclosed to the press and she was fired shortly thereafter.
The ambiguity over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and current and former trainers in despair. She says the facility’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a leverage tool and is a “logistically impossible” task, adding any efforts to euthanize even a one beluga would require “considerable personnel”, vehicles and specialized tools.
“There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.
She advocates for requests for the whales to be transferred immediately from the park, with its crumbling tanks and shrinking team.
In the autumn, Canada’s government official denied a request to transfer the whales to China.
“Granting the proposal would have meant a ongoing life in captivity and a reversion to performance for audiences,” the official stated. “As society, we know that belugas belong in the wild, not in pools for our entertainment. I could not in good conscience authorize an relocation that would prolong the treatment these belugas have experienced.”
But the former trainer said the minister’s remarks indicate a broader misunderstanding of the facts of existence for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.
“The public needs to realize these are whales that have existed solely in enclosed habitats and they will need constant supervision for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘close it down’.”
As authorities attempt to find a answer, proposals have been put forward, some of which have minimal feasibility. One proposal called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of Canada’s north – where whales are a primary resource of food for local populations.
A planned refuge in the region of Nova Scotia, which has received regulatory clearance, has been most controversial. The planned site, which includes extensive space of enclosed sea water, doesn’t yet exist. Proponents remain optimistic that it could eventually represent a permanent solution for eight of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s discussed with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “simply an trial” in the whales’ future.
Others say the possibility of a protected habitat represents a broader global shift away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a workable plan in the near future.
An official, head of the initiative, said the location will replicate the mental engagement and diet the whales obtain from caretakers, albeit in a significantly bigger area. He said after the medical condition of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|